| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
381. Need a fix: Widow - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
you want a battleship that can warp cloaked? I don't think many people will agree with that.
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.19 14:53:00
|
382. Will Bob Be Back? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: maralt Originally by: Plague Black Originally by: maralt blah blah blah...even though ccp did a full investigation and found nothing... blah blah blah I heard Enron executives also did some research on th...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.19 14:48:00
|
383. Will Bob Be Back? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: thoth foc Originally by: Malachon Draco Dubious propaganda attempt.. As you note, that is only your interruption. I have no interest in debating real life influences within the game. I'll chalk that up as a '...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.19 12:28:00
|
384. Will Bob Be Back? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Malachon Draco on 19/03/2008 12:07:41 Originally by: thoth foc Edited by: thoth foc on 19/03/2008 11:28:37 Originally by: Malachon Draco So you're saying that you believe that BoB just made up the outrage about ...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.19 12:07:00
|
385. Will Bob Be Back? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: maralt Originally by: Malachon Draco Why is it for a BoB victory enough that they don't die? I recall 3 clear objectives set by BoB. 1. Conquer all of 0.0 2. Goons will never be allowed to build up in 0.0 again 3. ...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.19 11:18:00
|
386. Will Bob Be Back? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: smitor Edited by: smitor on 19/03/2008 10:29:24 Originally by: Malachon Draco 1. Conquer all of 0.0 2. Goons will never be allowed to build up in 0.0 again 3. 'Chow, we're stealing your targets' at the point wh...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.19 11:16:00
|
387. Will Bob Be Back? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Rudi Storm Originally by: Malachon Draco Why is it for a BoB victory enough that they don't die? I recall 3 clear objectives set by BoB. 1. Conquer all of 0.0 2. Goons will never be allowed to build up in 0.0 again...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.19 11:07:00
|
388. Will Bob Be Back? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: 0raven0 Originally by: Thomina Yorke Stalemate = Victory. Yall attacked. For you to win you have to kill them. For them to win they have to not be killed. Guess what, they aren't killed Why is it for a BoB v...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.19 08:16:00
|
389. Will Bob Be Back? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Malachon Draco on 18/03/2008 14:53:22 Originally by: maralt Originally by: Onchas Erivvia Originally by: WeightedCompanionCube BoB will forever be the ones who had a CCP employee give them stuff. Squeezing th...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.18 14:52:00
|
390. what is a spider tank? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
A spider tank is where multiple ships rep each other rather than themselves. Imagine 4 battleships. Instead of each having 1 rep for themselves, they have a remote rep each. So if one of them gets shot, the other three can rep him, making the 4 s...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.18 12:33:00
|
391. Will Bob Be Back? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Garia666 By surviving they will recieve even more respect then any other alliance. They will be the only alliance who stood and faught and won. They will be what they stand for. A band of brothers.. Respect Respect?...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.18 12:31:00
|
392. 18 March 2008 - Daily downtime extended until approx 12.30 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Terraform meh... come on... i know it's only 30 minutes... extended downtime makes pandas sad, kill kittens and steals cookies from girlscouts... What kind of cookies?
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.18 12:28:00
|
393. 18 March 2008 - Daily downtime extended until approx 12.30 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Malachon Draco on 18/03/2008 12:23:57 Originally by: CCP Navigator Quote: Hi Navigator. Could you please try and explain what the nature of these bulk data changes are? Bulk Data is (mostly) the database informat...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.18 12:24:00
|
394. Corporate/Alliance Warfare: Cynosural Jammer mechanics - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
What would happen if you gave cynojammers a huge fuel tank and let it burn heavy water while operational? Make it 250k heavy water per hour (would finally give some more use for a very underused commodity). That way it becomes a real pain to keep ...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.17 13:46:00
|
395. Radical Re-Vamp of Local Chat Function - Remove it... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Basic idea is solid I think. I have always been a solid opponent of removing local unless there was a proper replacement. Your ideas are getting in the right direction for sure. One thing I think that will be very important is having a much bett...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.17 13:33:00
|
396. Invention and T2 BPOs, where to go from here. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I had an idea that would allow invention to very gradually overtake T2 BPOs and reward the dedicated inventors at the same time. The basic idea is to change the various data interfaces. And give them an opportunity to evolve when they are used a ...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.17 13:23:00
|
397. Improving Economies of Scale - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I would be in favour of just removing the 10% limit on reducing ME. Why not make it something like a log function. If you research that BS print for a year straight, you should be able to shave off another 10% IMO. Add another year and shave off a...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.17 13:07:00
|
398. Self Destructing - Rebalancing? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Adarr Originally by: Endless Subversion I could jump through a gate in my non-player aggressed battleship. I jump into a smaller camp. However, I'm cloaked, I could just start my self-destruct then. No flag when it ...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.17 13:03:00
|
399. Low Sec solution idea: Empire Guards - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Slapnuts MkGee Honestly...I hope it stays as is...keep everyone afraid of lo-sec. I spend most of my time in hi-sec, but then I discovered low-volume high-value courier runs, and how profitable they can be when the routes ru...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.17 12:58:00
|
400. Low Sec solution idea: Empire Guards - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Noone goes into lowsec because there is no point in going there. Rewards are too low and risk is too great. Even for individuals, I think eventually you're better off either finding some quiet spot in deep 0.0 or in some NPC station in 0.0 space. ...
- by Malachon Draco - at 2008.03.17 12:57:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |